A Documentary History of the
Cinnamon Bay Estate
1718 - 1917
PART I
Establishment and
Consolidation, 1718 - 1755
The 300 acre Cinnamon Bay Plantation was formed by the gradual
consolidation of three approximately 100 acre agricultural land
grants, generally referred to in Danish as "plantagies"
[SJLL, 1728]. While it is evident that at least two of these
parcels were associated through common family ownership within a
decade of their establishments, all were independently settled as
singularly functioning endeavors. By virtue of necessity, each of
these holdings would have been minimally comprised of a
processing facility, known in the era as a "works"; a
residence, with associated cook house and bake oven; a grouping
of shelters for the enslaved laborers, collectively referred to
as the "village"; and, a field system, made up of
cultivated areas, land cleared for pasture, and substantial
acreage left in forest to provide the necessary resources of
timber and fuel-wood. It can therefore be stated, that within the
bounds of the modern day Cinnamon Bay Estate, there lies at least
some evidence of the remains of three well established early
period plantagies, although to this date none of these original
sites have been conclusively located or defined.
Initially, the three small agricultural holdings taken up at
Cinnamon Bay were all known by the names of the owners. Hence the
plantation name, Cinnamon Bay, was probably not adopted
until well after the properties were merged to form a single
estate, perhaps as late as the 1760s when it first appeared in
mortgage records [MP, 1766-69]. The bay that fronted these
properties, however, was noted as Cinnamon Bay in colonial
documents dating back as far as the earliest records for St. John,
so it may well be that the name predates Danish settlement [SJLL,
1728]. It is believed that the name was given to the bay for the
abundance of "Kaneel boom", the Dutch term for Cinnamon
trees, which early Europeans encountered there. These trees were
not true Cinnamon trees, but rather a type of Myrtle which can
still be found there today, pimenta racemosa, known
locally as the Bay-rum Tree [Little & Wadsworth, 1964].
The Daniel Jansen Property
We may never know for certain which of the Danish colonists
was the first to take up a plantagie at Cinnamon Bay, but the
first to receive a formal Danish deed was Daniel Jansen, the
Creole son of an Irish born St. Thomas innkeeper, John Hatch, and
his Dutch born wife, Adriana Delicat.1 By the time St. John tax rolls began to be
compiled in 1728, the thirty-nine year old Burger Captain Daniel
Jansen was noted as the owner of a 3000 (Danish) foot long, by
2000 foot wide, Caneel Bay Quarter sugar plantagie which had been
taken up since 1718, so it is presumed he was the original
claimant of that property (see Map 1; parcel A, p. 18). Further
supporting Jansen's early presence on St. John is the fact that
his name appears on a list of the island's colonists compiled in
1722; however, no geographical location was indicated on that
occasion [LD, 1720-22].
Although the sugar works on Jansen's plantagie was described
in the 1728 tax rolls as "meedelmaadig" (mediocre or
run-of-the-mill) [SJLL, 1728], even a rudimentary sugar operation
would have been a fairly well developed affair. In 1718, when
Governor Bradel first laid out a set of guidelines for the
occupation of St. John, one of the six requirements was that a
sugar works had to be erected within five years on penalty of the
confiscation of the property [BD, 1718]. While it was later
realized that not all of the land on St. John was suitable for
growing sugarcane and the order was never enforced, any planter
with the necessary capital and appropriate location was clearly
encouraged to do so.
To establish a sugar plantagie, the first step was the arduous
process of clearing away the dense subtropical forest which still
covered much of the island. After the larger trees and woody bush
were cut off, the land was further cleared by burning. As the
task of preparing the ground for cultivation commenced,
construction of the necessary plantagie structures was also begun.
A circular, level earthen platform was built, upon which an
animal driven crushing machine for the extraction of sugarcane
juice was mounted. Next, a stout, fire resistant boiling house,
with at least three built-in kettles, would begin to take shape,
followed soon after by a warehouse, a shed for the dry-storage of
fuel-wood and magass, a cooper's shop, pens for the property's
beasts of burden, and a rum still. Additionally, shelters
for the enslaved, a house for the overseer, and a residence with
a detached cook house and bake oven, suitable for a prominent
burger and his family, would all be raised in relative close
proximity to the sugar factory complex (see Figure 1).
Figure 1: Depiction of a
rudimentary sugar works
of the early eighteenth
century
The largest of the
properties that would later be merged to form the broader
Cinnamon Bay estate, and the only one of the three which was well
suited for development as a sugar plantagie, the Daniel Jansen
parcel was the most economically viable of the holdings. As
development of the property progressed, production capabilities
increased, leading the Jansen family to seek additional lands in
order to raise their level of production and attain maximum
profitability from the holding. The first substantial expansion
of the Jansen property came in 1728, not by purchase, but through
the marriage of Daniel and Adriana Jansen's widowed daughter,
Elizabeth, to Pieter Durloo. In that year, Durloo had expanded
his St. John holdings to include a well situated shorefront
cotton plantagie, which lay alongside the Jansen property (see
Map 1; parcel B, p.18) [JP, Durloo vs. Jansen, 1745-49].
But Captain Jansen did not survive to realize his goal of
establishing a large and lucrative sugar plantation on St. John.
After his death in 1729 [JP, 1745-49], it was to be his widow and
their heirs who would see the property through the final stages
of development to emerge as a valuable and highly coveted estate.
Map 1: Detail from a 1918
United States survey map of
St. John overlaid with the
approximate boundaries of
the Jansen (parcel A), Gandy/Durloo
(parcel B), and
de Buyck/Beaudewyn (parcel C)
plantagies.
The Gandy / Durloo Property
Described in the 1728 tax rolls as being located "inde
flacten af Caneel Bay" (in the flat of Cinnamon Bay), Peter
Durloo's newly acquired cotton plantagie bounded the Jansen
holding on its south barricade, and ran 3000 feet in length along
the shoreline of Cinnamon Bay. The Durloo property had been
previously taken up in 1722 by William Gandy2
[SJLL, 1728], an Englishman and master builder by trade [PCR,
1723]. Gandy had lived on his waterfront holding with his wife,
Elizabeth, and her two daughters, Anna Maria and Rachel Mauor [STBP,
1724-32]. Given his abilities as a builder one would assume that
the structures Gandy erected on his property were soundly
constructed and well finished. Experienced in the construction of
packhouses on St. Thomas, it might well be that the warehouse,
which still stands on the Cinnamon Bay waterfront today,
comprises at least elements of Gandy's handiwork. It is also
possible that even after taking up a plantagie Gandy had
continued to practice his trade, and he may have been responsible
for overseeing the construction of the original structures on the
nearby Jansen sugar plantagie.
Figure
2: A bay side cotton plantagie of the early eighteenth century
The physical infrastructure of a cotton plantagie was sparse
in comparison to a property engaged in sugar production, the only
necessary structures being a shed, where the ginning and baling
of the cotton took place, a dry weatherproof storage building, a
residence with its associated cook house and bake oven, and
shelters for the workers (see figure 2). Labor requirements were
also comparatively low, and no more than ten slaves were ever
noted as working the Gandy plantagie before it was purchased by
Peter Durloo in 1728 [SJLL, 1729]. It is likely, therefore, that
only three or four wattle and daub structures comprised the
entire workers village on the site during this period.
Unlike William Gandy, Peter Durloo did not live on his
Cinnamon Bay plantagie, and as early as 1729 the property may
have already been integrated with the Jansen holding. In fact,
records suggest that Durloo only financed the acquisition of the
parcel for the already heavily indebted Jansen heirs. In any
event, the purchase of the waterfront Gandy plantagie by the
husband of Daniel Jansen's eldest daughter, not only increased
the amount of land available to the Jansen family for cultivation,
but also secured them unencumbered access to the shoreline for
the export of their products and the import of materials and
supplies [JP, 1745-49]. However, a formal merging of the two
properties' operations was not reported until 1731, when land
records show Daniel Jansen's widow, Adriana, in possession
of both plantagies [SJLL, 1731]. And, although the former Gandy
parcel continued to be recorded in the tax rolls as a cotton
plantagie until 1739, it is evident that at least a portion of
the property had long since been converted to sugarcane
cultivation by that date [JP, 1745-49].
Further cementing the Jansen family's ties to the former Gandy
plantagie was the marriage of Daniel and Adriana Jansen's son,
Johannes, to William Gandy's stepdaughter, Rachel Mauor, in 1731
[STBP, 1723-32]. After their wedding, the couple took up
residence on the property where they resided until Johannes'
death ten years later [SJLL, 1732].
So it can be stated with assurance that while the industrial
heart of the Jansen plantagie continued to be the property's
active sugar works, by 1731 the buildings associated with the
former Gandy/Durloo cotton plantagie had become integral elements
of the recently expanded Jansen estate complex: a property worked
at that time by a combined labor force of twenty-seven adult male
and female slaves.
It is just an aside, but there is a poignant postscript to the
story of William Gandy. After selling his plantagie to Peter
Durloo in 1728, Gandy moved to his wife's inherited property on
Lovango Cay, where it is said that soon after he was murdered in
his sleep by his slaves [Martfeldt, c. 1765].
The St. John Slave Insurrection of 1733
and its Impact on the
Jansen Properties at Cinnamon Bay
By 1733, the Cinnamon Bay sugar plantagie, now run by the
widowed Adriana Jansen with her two younger sons, Lieven and
Johannes, and worked by fifty slaves, appears to have been going
through a period of stable productivity. In the previous year
more than eleven thousand pounds of sugar had been delivered to
the Company warehouse on St. Thomas for credit to Madam Jansen's
account [LD, 1730-32], and in early May another fourteen
hogsheads of brown sugar and three barrels of kill-devil (rum)
had been sent [STRB, 1730-37].
But this situation was soon to change. The spring of 1733
proved to be the driest in memory, and it was soon followed by a
long and destructive summer hurricane season. As provisions
became increasingly scarce, more and more slaves took to the
secluded hills of St. John's well forested interior to escape the
famine that had gripped the plantagies.
In October, word spread across the island that all of the
enslaved from the Suhm property on the East End of St. John, as
well as a number from the Company estate and other plantagies
around the Coral Bay area, had gone maron. Despite all efforts to
hunt them down, the runaways deftly avoided capture; their
lurking presence serving only to heighten the already tense
atmosphere in the colony. Then, at three o'clock on the morning
of November 23, 1733, the first defiant acts of outright
rebellion took place on the Coral Bay plantagie owned by
Magistrate Johannes Sødtmann
[Pannet, 1733 (trans. Caron & Highfield, 1984)].
The well documented 1733 slave insurrection on St. John,
proved to be one of the longest and most costly uprisings in the
history of the West Indies colonies. After gaining control of the
Danish fort in Coral Bay, the rebels swept across the island
plundering the plantagies and killing any white inhabitant they
encountered. But not all of the slaves were drawn into the plot.
Many fled along with their masters or escaped into hiding to
avoid confrontation. Some even stood their ground against the
onslaught, protecting both their homes and the planters'
properties. Such was the case at the Jansen plantagie, where it
was reported that when the insurgents arrived to enlist Madam
Jansen's laborers into their group, "these Negroes, who had
armed themselves defensively, received the rebels with
indescribable courage [Pannet, 1733]." They were not,
however, able to protect the property's dwelling house, storage
building, and boiling house from being looted and burned, nor
could they prevent the Jansen cane fields from being set ablaze [BD,
1734]. As for Madam Jansen and her family, Adriana was on St.
Thomas when the revolt broke out and thereby avoided being caught
up in the fray, but it was later reported that her sons Johannes
and Lieven, along with their families, had narrowly escaped death
by concealing themselves on tiny Cinnamon Cay which lies only a
few hundred feet off the beach at Cinnamon Bay [Martfeldt, c.1765].
For three months the rebels doggedly held St. John,
continually laying siege upon a makeshift fortress the colonists
had erected at Peter Durloo's Klein Caneel Bay plantagie. It was
only after the Danes enlisted the help of French troops from
Martinique that they were able to shake the Africans' resolve.
Still, for months to come many of the rebels remained at large,
and it was not until August 25, 1734, that the last fifteen
stragglers were finally lured into surrender.
The de Buyck / Beaudewyn Property
The St. John slave revolt stunned the island's colonists and
suppressed development on the plantagies for a number of years.
Yet it was during this time period that the Jansen family again
increased their land holdings. When the yearly tax accountings
for St. John were resumed in 1736, Daniel and Adriana Jansen's
eldest son, Jasper, was reported as the owner of a small coastal
cotton plantagie directly west of the two Jansen properties
occupied by his mother and younger brother, Johannes [SJLL, 1736]
(see Map 1; parcel C, p.18).
The property that Jasper Jansen acquired had first been taken
up by Pieter de Buyck in 1719. After de Buyck's death in 1728, it
became the property of Abraham Beaudewyn, husband and legal
guardian of de Buyck's widow [STBP, 1728]. Despite Pieter de
Buyck's relatively short tenure of ownership, the bay which
fronted his plantagie has continued to be known to this day by
his name: Peter Bay -- as has Peter Peak, Peter Cay, and Peter
Point [Edwards, 1993].
Neither de Buyck nor Beaudewyn ever lived on their Peter Bay
property. Instead, they relied on hired masterknegts to oversee
the day-to-day running of the plantagie [SJLL, 1728-33]. The
least developed of the holdings which were joined to form the
Cinnamon Bay estate, only three enslaved laborers, Piero, Janno,
and Lena, had been on the plantagie at the time of de Buyck's
death [STBP, 1728], and no more than six workers were ever
reported on the property prior to Jasper Jansen's purchase [SJLL,
1736-39]. With such a small labor force it is apparent that only
modest amounts of provisions, cotton, and some sugar (which was
processed elsewhere) were being grown. Given the property's
limited production, coupled with the fact that the owners were
seldom, if ever, in residence, it is unlikely that the plantagie
consisted of anything more than a simple field system, a baling
and ginning shed, a storage building, one small dwelling for an
overseer, animal pens, and a few shelters for the enslaved. It
was reported in the tax records, however, that soon after Jasper
Jansen's purchase an upgraded cotton works was erected on the
property [SJLL, 1737-39].
Like their predecessors, Jasper Jansen and his wife Rebecca
van Still did not live on their property, but neither were they
recorded to have employed a masterknegt. Upon Jasper's death, in
August of 1737, Rebecca became the recorded owner of the Peter
Bay plantagie. It is of interest to note that in the three years
following Jasper Jansen's death, one Mulatto woman was reported
as the only free person in residence on the property, while as
many as eleven enslaved men, women, and children, still labored
on its ground [SJLL, 1737-39].
By all appearances it would seem that while the Jansen, Gandy/Durloo,
and de Buyck/Beaudewyn properties remained listed in the St. John
tax records as separate parcels throughout the first half of the
eighteenth century, by the late 1730s all three were already
being run as a single Jansen family holding. And while the
administrative core of this broadly diversified operation was
undoubtedly the original Daniel Jansen plantagie, the extended
Jansen family took full advantage of all the resources and
infrastructures associated with each of the properties they had
acquired. As a result, during this time period the activities on
the Cinnamon Bay land holdings were still relatively non-centralized,
and population dispersal over the broad area of their lands was
most likely at its peak.
The First Recorded Inventory of the
Jansen Family's Cinnamon Bay Property
Some years before the death of Madam Adriana Jansen, members
of the family had begun to be concerned that the aging matriarch
might "distribute the estate to the disadvantage of the
heirs." To aid in a proper evaluation of the Jansen sugar
plantagie, in 1738 Peter Durloo and Lieven Jansen requested that
a formal appraisal of the combined Jansen and Gandy/Durloo
properties be carried out. While it is unfortunate that the
standing structures on the parcels were not itemized in the
appraisal inventory, the following extract provides not only our
first detailed look at conditions on the Jansen's Cinnamon Bay
property, but also offers a rare glimpse at the composition of a
Danish colonial sugar plantagie during the pre-consolidation era
(for a copy of the original inventory see Appendix III, document
1):